Share

Compliance Specific News & Resources for GoWest Credit Unions
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
Compliance Newsletter

COMPLIANCE HEADLINES

National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) 


NCUA Board Approves Updates to MDI Preservation Program and Share Insurance Fund Report Shows an Increase in the Assets of CAMEL 3 Credit Unions 


The National Credit Union Administration Board held its second open meeting of 2024 and adopted revisions to an interpretive ruling and policy statement (IRPS) 13-1, governing the Minority Depository Institution Preservation Program for credit unions. In addition, the Board was briefed on the performance of the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund for the fourth quarter of 2023. 


Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data Requirements 


The NCUA released Regulatory Alert 24-RA-01 to remind credit unions of the HMDA data filing requirements. 

 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 


Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) 


CFPB Data Spotlight Report: Credit Card Data: Small Issuers Offer Lower Rates 


The CFPB released a Data Spotlight Report which reviewed the newly updated Terms of Credit Card Plans survey. The survey data revealed that larger banks tended to offer worse terms and conditions as well as having higher interest rates. The 25 largest credit card issuers charged customers interest rates of 8 to 10 points higher that small and medium sized banks and credit unions. Some of the key findings of the survey included: 

  • Large issuers offered worse rates across credit scores: Whether a person has poor, good, or great credit, large issuers offer higher interest rates. For example, the median interest rate for people with good credit – a credit score between 620 and 719 – was 28.20% for large issuers and 18.15% for small issuers. 

  • Fifteen issuers reported credit cards with interest rates above 30%: Nine of the largest credit card issuers in the country reported at least one product with a maximum purchase annual percentage rate (APR) over 30%. Many of these high-cost products were private label or co-branded cards offered through retail partnerships. 

  • Large issuers were more likely to charge annual fees: Among large issuers’ credit cards, 27% carried an annual fee, compared to just 9.5% of small firms. The average annual fee was $157 for the largest issuers, as opposed to $94 for smaller issuers. 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________ 


Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) 


Statement on Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending 


The FFIEC issued a statement to communicate principles for the examination of supervised financial institutions’ residential property appraisal and evaluation processes to: 

  • Mitigate risks that may arise due to potential discrimination or bias in those processes; and 

  • Promote credible valuations. 

Institutions rely on real estate valuations when assessing the level of collateral support in residential credit decisions. Deficiencies in real estate valuations, including those due to valuation discrimination or bias, can lead to increased safety and soundness risks, as well as consumer harm and have an adverse impact on borrowers and their communities. Examples of such harm are consumers being denied access to credit for which they may be otherwise qualified, offered credit at less favorable terms, or steered to a narrower class of loan products.  


For an institution, the failure of internal controls to identify, monitor, and control valuation discrimination or bias could negatively affect credit decisions, potentially exposing an institution to legal and compliance risks or affecting an institution’s financial condition and operations. Furthermore, material findings and concerns related to noncompliance with laws and regulations generally negatively affect the supervisory assessment of an institution’s management in a safety and soundness examination. 

___________________________________________________________________________________ 


Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 


IRS Shares 7 Warning Signs Employee Retention Credit Claims May Be Incorrect; Urges Businesses to Revisit Eligibility, Resolve Issues Now Before March 22 


The IRS released an alert to businesses about seven suspicious warning signs that could signal future IRS problems involving ERC claims. The indicators, built on feedback from the tax professional community and IRS compliance personnel, center on misinformation some unscrupulous ERC promoters used. Many of these groups urged taxpayers to ignore advice from trusted tax professionals and claim the pandemic-era credit even though they may not qualify. In the alert, the seven suspicious signs an ERC claim could be incorrect include: 

  • Too many quarters being claimed 

  • Government orders that don’t qualify 

  • Too many employees and wrong calculations 

  • Business citing supply chain issues 

  • Business claiming ERC for too much of a tax period 

  • Business didn’t pay wages of didn’t exist during eligibility period 

  • Promoter says there’s nothing to lose 

 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 


Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) 


FinCEN Proposes Rule to Combat Illicit Finance and National Security Threats in Investment Advisor Sector 


Credit unions that offer investment services for their members through partnerships with CUSOs or other investment advisors should be aware of a recent proposed rule from FinCEN.  The proposed rule would add investment advisors to the definition of a financial institution and thereby extend the BSA reporting requirements to a sector that may not have been providing the reports. 


The proposed rule would require certain investment advisers to apply Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) requirements pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), including implementing risk-based AML/CFT programs, reporting suspicious activity to FinCEN, and fulfilling recordkeeping requirements. The Treasury also published its risk assessment of this sector, which identifies illicit finance threats and vulnerabilities in the sector, including how the uneven application of AML/CFT requirements across the sector allows both legitimate and illicit investors to “shop around” for an adviser who does not need to inquire into their source of wealth. 


FinCEN Sees Increase in BSA Reporting Involving the Use of CVC for Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking 


FinCEN released a Financial Trend Analysis (FTA) which highlighted an increase in in BSA reporting associated with the use of convertible virtual currency (CVC) and online child sexual exploitation (OCSE) and human trafficking. The FTA is based on BSA reporting filed between January 2020 and December 2021. 

FinCEN’s analysis highlights the value of BSA reporting filed by regulated financial institutions. Key findings in the FTA include: 

  • The total number of OCSE- and human trafficking-related BSA reports involving CVC increased from 336 in 2020 to 1,975 in 2021. 

  • BSA filers specifically reported child sexual abuse material (CSAM) or human trafficking and CSAM in 95 percent of the OCSE- and human trafficking-related BSA reports involving CVC. 

  • BSA reports overwhelmingly identified bitcoin as the primary CVC used for purported OCSE- and human trafficking-related activity, however, this does not necessarily mean that other types of CVC are not used for such crimes. 

  • FinCEN identified four typologies (i.e. the use of darknet marketplaces that distribute CSAM, peer-to-peer exchanges, CVC mixers, and CVC kiosks) that describe common trends within BSA reports related to OCSE and human trafficking. 



League InfoSight Highlight

League InfoSight Highlight: Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending 


Just this week (February 12, 2024) the Federal Financial Examination Council (FFIEC) issued a statement to communicate principles for examination of residential property appraisal and evaluation (valuation) practices to mitigate risks that may arise due to potential discrimination or bias in those practices; and to promote credible valuations. 


Within the article, examiners are instructed to assess financial institutions’ compliance management systems and risk management practices for identifying and mitigating potential discrimination or bias in residential property valuation practices. 


To promote compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements, the guidance instructs credit unions to establish a formal valuation review program. A review program could help address any identified deficiencies due to potential valuation discrimination or bias before making a credit decision. 


When it comes time for your exam, whether it is a safety and soundness exam or specific consumer compliance exam, expect a review of risk management processes for residential lending activity. Below are more details to help your credit union prepare! 


Consumer Compliance Exam  


Examiners will look to see if the credit unions’ compliance management system is inclusive of processes to consider whether the risk management practices for residential real estate valuations are appropriate to identify and address valuation discrimination. 


Board and Management Oversight. Examiners will look to ensure that the credit union implements and maintains compliance management systems, including third-party oversight based on the risk profile for residential lending. They will also look to ensure information is being provided to the Board to communicate the strength of the consumer compliance program. 


Third-party risk management. Examiners will evaluate the credit unions’ oversight of residential real estate valuation third parties’ consumer compliance related policies, procedures, internal controls, and training. Also, the evaluation of the credit unions’ due diligence and ongoing monitoring of those third parties, including those entities/persons preparing valuation reports, appraisals, and appraisal management companies. 


Consumer Compliance Program. Examiners will review policies, procedures, training, monitoring, and audit practices all with the focus on ensuring the credit union is identifying potentially discriminatory valuation practices or results. The credit unions’ complaint response system and processes will also be reviewed, along with the ability for the credit union to identify and resolve incidences of potential valuation discrimination. 


Safety and Soundness Exam 


Examiners will review credit unions’ residential real estate collateral valuation programs, including consideration of whether risk management practices for valuations are appropriate to identify and address valuation discrimination or bias and promote credible valuations. This will include a review of consumer protection issues, risk assessments, governance, collateral valuation program, third-party risk management, valuation review function, credit risk review function, and the credit unions’ training program. 

Resources: 

Glory LeDu
CEO, League InfoSight and CU Risk Intelligence 





Whether you are a federal or state-chartered credit union, there are state laws that impact your operations. The most efficient and quickest way to find those laws is through InfoSight. This member benefit provides you with access to applicable state content for all 50 states, without you needing to search through tons of random online sources. Stop wasting time trying to research when InfoSight has aggregated all the information your credit union needs to stay compliant in an ever-changing and evolving federal and state environment. 



ARTICLES OF INTEREST

Fact Sheet: AML Program and SAR Filing Requirements for Registered Investment Advisors and Exempt Reporting Advisors NPRM 


NCUA’s Funds Receive Clean Audit Opinions 


NCUA and CDFI to Co-Host Feb. 29 Webinar on Certification Application 


SCAM UPDATES

Government Impersonators Mail Fake Notices to Business Owners 


Romance Scammers Love...To Take Your Money 


Alleged Trading Platform Nasdaqon.com Appears To Be Engaged in Fraud 


As Nationwide Fraud Losses Top $10 Billion in 2023, FTC Steps Up Efforts to Protect the Public 


“Love Stinks” - When a Scammer is Involved 


COMPLIANCE CALENDAR

Mar 11, 2024: Comments Due FTC Proposed COPPA Changes 


Mar 22, 2024: Last day to submit IRS ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program 


Mar 25, 2024: CFPB Proposed Rule on NSF (Declined Transaction) Fees 


Apr 1, 2024: Comments Due CFPB Overdraft Rule 


Apr. 30, 2024: 5300 Call Report Due 


May 12, 2024: FRB Interchange Fee Proposal Comments Due 


May 27, 2024: Memorial Day – Federal Holiday 


TOOLS & RESOURCES

Effective Dates
Bulletins & Alerts
Webinar Calendar
AffirmX and GoWest Partnership

Q&A OF THE WEEK

Under what circumstances might a commercial loan be required to be reported under HMDA? 


The following are examples of closed-end mortgage loans and open-end lines of credit that are not excluded from reporting under §1003.3(c)(10) because, although they primarily are for a business or commercial purpose, they also meet the definition of a home improvement loan under §1003.2(i), a home purchase loan under §1003.2(j), or a refinancing under §1003.2(p): 

  • A closed-end mortgage loan or an open-end line of credit to purchase or to improve a multifamily dwelling or a single-family investment property, or a refinancing of a closed-end mortgage loan or an open-end line of credit secured by a multifamily dwelling or a single-family investment property; 

  • A closed-end mortgage loan or an open-end line of credit to improve a doctor's office or a daycare center that is located in a dwelling other than a multifamily dwelling; and 

  • A closed-end mortgage loan or an open-end line of credit to a corporation, if the funds from the loan or line of credit will be used to purchase or to improve a dwelling, or if the transaction is a refinancing. 

In contrast, the following would be excluded transactions. The following are examples of closed-end mortgage loans and open-end lines of credit that are not covered loans because they primarily are for a business or commercial purpose, but they do not meet the definition of a home improvement loan under §1003.2(i), a home purchase loan under §1003.2(j), or a refinancing under §1003.2(p): 

  • A closed-end mortgage loan or an open-end line of credit whose funds will be used primarily to improve or expand a business, for example to renovate a family restaurant that is not located in a dwelling, or to purchase a warehouse, business equipment, or inventory; 

  • A closed-end mortgage loan or an open-end line of credit to a corporation whose funds will be used primarily for business purposes, such as to purchase inventory; and 

  • A closed-end mortgage loan or an open-end line of credit whose funds will be used primarily for business or commercial purposes other than home purchase, home improvement, or refinancing, even if the loan or line of credit is cross-collateralized by a covered loan. 

For your individualized login, select your state below. 

Arizona
Colorado
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Wyoming

If you have questions about this communication, contact us at 800.546.4465, or via our shared email inbox at compliance@gowest.org.

Have a great week!

Your GoWest Compliance Team, 

David Curtis

CUCE

Director, Compliance Services
P: 206.340.4785

Tiarra Sanders-Hausa

NCCO

Manager, Compliance Services

P: 206.618.9302

Copyright © 2023 GoWest Credit Union Association. All Rights Reserved.

Mailing Address:
GoWest Credit Union Association, 18000 International Blvd Ste. 1102, SeaTac, WA 98188, United States
1.800.995.9064

View in Browser | Manage Your Preferences | Unsubscribe

Email Marketing by ActiveCampaign